Basic Website
In this stage, you will design and write a small website with a topic of your own choice consisting of
webpages using Hypertext Markup Language (HTML5) code. You are to develop a basic website, which
provides information in a clear way and links to other pages.
You are to demonstrate your understanding of the correct use of HTML tags. Use both the code and
design view, if you are using MS Expression Web editor. It will be obvious to your marker if you only
used the design view, as it shows up in the code structure. Automatically generated code looks
different from manually created HTML code. We will look for evidence that you either manually coded
the webpages or that you manually corrected the code generated by MS Expression Web or a similar
software.
Part III of this document has a sample case study that we’ll go through during the tutorial. For this first
stage, you will need to follow the same steps of the case study but starting to use your own topic.
Your topic is free for you to choose (a hobby? Small business?). However, extra marks will be awarded
(see marking criteria) if you decide to pick any of the following:
• Indigenous Australians.
• Australia’s Wildlife.
These are very broad topics, so please talk with your lecturer/tutor to narrow them down.
7113IBA Enterprise Mobility
Paper Appraisal Project 35%
Due - 5pm, Friday (Week 7)
The submission should be a group submission comprising of one research paper appraisal per group member. The papers should preferably come from those already summarised in the Annotated Bibliography project, and are to address the topic of how modern mobile information delivery technologies (IS/IT) are able to influence/support modern business strategies.
Each paper appraisal should be about 500 words, so that a typical group submission (consisting of three members) would be about 1500 words in length. If a group consists of two people, then the submission would typically be about 1000 words in length (two Paper Appraisals).
Each paper appraisal in the submitted assessment will be judged on its own merits and allocated a mark, with the marks averaged across the submitted papers to achieve an overall mark for the group.
It is therefore within the interest of each group member to ensure that all the paper appraisals submitted by the group be of the best standard possible to achieve a good mark.
The group submission should clearly state who the group members are, with a selected member submitting the assignment.
If still unclear about the requirements, please get in touch with us on 37357519 or email anytime.
The papers should be reviewed according to the Guidelines for Paper Appraisal process outlined below.
Examples of the type of papers suitable for review can be found in the assessment section of the Learning@Griffith website.
Guidelines for Paper Appraisal
- Paper description:
- describe and list key (most essential) ideas/points
- what are the main contributions?
- Detailed comments on the paper
- how was the research planned?
- what data were used?
- what analytical tools were employed?
- what did you learn reading the paper?
- what are the technical points that you appreciated?
- What are the most compelling reasons of why you like this work?
- What are the most compelling reasons of why you dislike this work?
- has serious technical mistakes (describe them)
- isn’t novel (provide/suggest related work/papers)
- doesn’t demonstrate (all) its point by proofs, simulations, experiments (be specific)
- makes unreasonable assumptions (describe them)|
- Comments on references & related work:
- how does the paper relate to other works/projects/papers?
- which of them have been cited and which you know that are related by they have not been referenced by the authors
- Comment on presentation style:
- does the paper describe its goals clearly?
- does the paper deliver what was originally promised?
- what were the motivations (what issues/problems inspired this research), assumptions (of the setting, requirements), and contributions?
- is the reference format/list of keywords complete?
- Are the figures readabl ? Can you see trends? Do they explain the trends or “unusual behaviour”? Do the results in the figures make sense? If
- not, mention it in the review. Raise questions…
- list any writing style remarks/corrections (English grammar/syntax, spelling) …
- Make concrete suggestions for how to improve the paper: list your recommendations. Be constructive and clear.
- Does the paper leave unanswered questions?
- TOPIC:
- AUTOMATED ATTENDANCE SYSTEM USING FACIAL RECOGNITION SYSTEM
- Description of Assignment:
- The purpose of this assignment is to develop skills on demonstration. Students will demonstrate their
- work to the supervisor. Student will introduce the project and show system model and the use of
- simulator for their project work to the supervisor.
- After successful completion of this assessment, students are expected to have
- a. Developed skills on demonstration to technical audience.
- b. Developed skills on acquiring feedback from technical audience and incorporating that
- knowledge into the future project to improve it.
- Description of the assessment:
- 1. Background
- This assignment aims to develop student’s demonstration skills on project outcomes to the technical
- audience.
- 2. Requirements
- The purpose of this assignment is to demonstrate status of the project. The student will present system
- model, method used to solve the problem and the use of the simulator in the project.
- Introduction:
- A high-level description of the project. A clear introduction of the project and content of the
- demonstration.
- System Model:
- Student is required to demonstrate a detailed proposed system model with a clear view on how to use it
- to solve the problem in the project.
- Use of Simulator:
- Student should present a detailed analysis of the simulators available for the project simulation and a
- selection of the simulator for the project with proper justifications.
- Conclusion and Future Direction:
- Should include a clear conclusion regarding the completed work and future direction of the project
AssignmentTopics 0) Fog computing is becoming a promising computing paradigm that extends cloud computing functionalities. Discuss some key privacy and security issues that arise in fog computing and why these issues need to be addressed. 1) Ransomware attacks are one of the key cybercrimes that affect businesses. Examine the various types of businesses that are targeted by cybercriminals for ransomware attacks and how can businesses protect themselves from these type of attacks. 2) You develop IOT system for a client. During one of your meeting you highlight the importance of having updated firewall, encryption and filtering technologies to help detect and mitigate security threats. Your client is trying to persuade you not to worry too much about the security aspects and proceed with only basic security features. As a professional what would be your action? Will you proceed with less secure IOT system OR tell your client that you cannot proceed with the project with less security features. Use proper reasoning to justify your answer. 3) Internet of Things (IOT) enabled devices usage has significantly increased in Australia over the past few years. A key risk with IOT enabled device is that it can be hacked and personal information can be stolen. Smart Parking is one example of IOT technology that have been used by city councils to manage parking issues. Discuss two key security issues in relation to using a Smart Parking App/System. Provide a detailed explanation of the issue and how consumers can safeguard themselves from these vulnerabilities. 4) Wearable technologies have gained prominence in healthcare service sector over the past decade. Discuss in detail the type of patient data that are captured by wearable devices used in healthcare services (example aged care facilities, hospitals) and using suitable examples from your research explain what tools and techniques are available to effectively use this data to improve patient safety and service quality in aged care facilities/hospitals.
Assignment Structure and submission guidelines: Assignment1 is a formative assessment and is divided into two parts to assist students in having a steady learning curve based on feedback and revisions.
Part 1A of assignment 1 focuses on developing an annotated bibliography for the scenario you have selected for subsequent analysis. You need to use the template provided below for developing this annotated bibliography. 3 research sources (2 journal papers and 1 conference paper) need to be used for this assessment. Student should ensure that the research sources they have selected are published within the last 3 years (2017-2020). Students have to submit the first part by Week 3 due date mentioned in this document. This assessment will be marked by your respective tutor and written constructive feedback will be provided to students to help improve their research process and subsequent analysis that will be conducted in Part 1B of this assessment.
The snapshot of “Customer_ Delivery” database structure is given below. Customer_ Delivery is a
database that keeps track of information about the Customer orders, deliveries, Staff, products and
Customers registered in the system.
Assume that, you are working as an IT specialist in an organisation and are required to extract information
from this database by building the database and executing SQL queries according to the instructions given
below.
NOTE: The primary keys (PK) and foreign keys (FK)are marked in the database structure as shown in
Figure1. Some keys are primary keys (PK) as well as foreign keys (FK), they are marked as PF.